Doesn't this make you miss dplyr tho?

Listen I’m as surprised as you. I’m on record in multiple places talking about how much I love dplyr. I’ve referred to it as “my favorite package” more than once, and have definitely said that you could pry it “from my cold, dead hands.” dplyr is a fantastic package for data manipulation, and has been the primary workhorse in my analytics workflow for the past few years.

But now it’s time for pandas - the Python equivalent of dplyr - and something about pandas clicked just enough for me that I for once found myself working in Python and not missing R.

“Different enough” is perfect for learning

Once I thought I could learn Portuguese and Spanish at the same time (I know), and as I was talking with a friend from Brazil he just started laughing and said “You’ve used English, Spanish, and Portuguese all in a single sentence.”

What “clicked” for me in pandas was accepting it for what it was - the Python way of manipulating data. And what I actually like about pandas is that it’s written differently enough than dplyr that the learning doesn’t get muddled.

For example, here’s the code I wrote in pandas:

top_oceania_wines = reviews.loc[['Australia', 'New Zealand']) & (reviews.points >= 95)]

And if I had written it using dplyr I’d do something like:

top_oceania_wines <- reviews %>% 
  filter(country %in% c("Australia", "New Zealand"),
         points >= 95)

Mental models

I believe that programming is a literacy, and as such, a lot of how we teach literacy can be used to teach programming. This is part of what makes the tidyverse so powerful as an entry to programming in data science - its syntax readily lends itself to literacy parallels that we’re already familiar with. pandas isn’t written in the same way, which means that what needed to happen for me to start understanding pandas was to start building up a mental model of how to “read” the code.

Whereas I’d read the above dplyr code as:

Create a tibble named top_oceania_wines by taking the reviews tibble then filtering for Australia or New Zealand in the country column AND values of at least 95 in the points column.

my mind reads the pandas code as:

Create a DataFrame named top_oceania_wines by returning the rows within the country column in the reviews DataFrame that match either Australia or New Zealand AND the rows within the points column in the reviews DataFrame that have a value of at least 95.

My pandas statement is still a work in progress, and more verbose than it likely needs to be, but illustrates how we’re getting to the same destination using different paths.

I’ve only just started to scratch the surface of pandas, but am starting to get a handle on things and am excited to see where it takes me!